Passive-Aggression: an expression of inauthenticity

Passive-aggression: the Suppressed, Repressed, Dissociated

Possibly one of the most pervasive features of undesireable or antisocial behaviour we find in society is passive-aggression.  Passive-aggression is aggressive or hostile energy that is used to emotionally injure or insult the recipient in a way that attempts to conceal the intent of the aggressor.  It is the result of hostility, frustration or anger that is suppressed – sometimes completely dissociated by repression over time – instead of being expressed openly and honestly.  The suppressed or dissociated emotions emerge as destructive behaviours rather than honest words, with the behaviour invariably causing offence, loss or inconvenience to others.  It is so common that all of us, at one time or another, will be passive-aggressive.  It becomes a problem when it becomes a habit, or an ingrained aspect of our character, commonly found in people who ‘bottle up’ their feelings or who have never learned to routinely express themselves openly and honestly.

Suppression: the conscious refusal to express emotion or impulse

Repression: the habitual (unconscious) denial of emotion or impulse

Dissociation: a process of disconnecting from thoughts, emotions or awareness

Passive-aggressive Behaviour

Examples of passive-aggression vary widely and can be seen in stereotypical ‘teenage’ sullenness, contrariness, deliberate avoidance of open communication; imposing oneself upon another; intrusion of privacy; stalking or spying; disrespecting or disregarding boundaries; covert destruction of property or ‘accidental’ damage and theft of property or ideas; usurping behaviours (e.g. oneupmanship, outdoing, favouritism and partiality); sexual harassment; using social group settings as a hiding place for personal attacks on individual members; destructive or ruinous online or anonymous behaviours; deliberately poor time-keeping or unreliability; procrastination or failure in honouring agreements; feigned ignorance, sarcasm and condescension; subtle insults and personal snubs; exploitation; having little regard for the other’s feelings/ being unempathic; backbiting, being ‘two-faced’, gossiping; destructive envy; causing others inconvenience, stress or loss in subtle or crude ways.  As most will observe, examples of passive-aggressive behaviour are rife, with sadly much of it normalised in our society.

Effects on Others

There are many ways passive-aggressive individuals find to covertly express their hostility in ways that help them evade detection or accusation, but the effects upon the recipient are usually unmistakable and are themselves often enough evidence of the presence of passive-aggression itself: feeling offended or ‘kicked in the gut’ emotionally; feelings of hurt, frustration, anxiety or anger that make no immediate sense; feeling insulted by words that appear to be inoffensive; discovering damaged property or missing possessions; suffering loss of time or opportunity by, for example, the aggressor being habitually late for meetings or cancelling at the last minute or other ways of wasting one’s time.  In each case, victims of passive-aggressive people are typically left feeling slightly disturbed, troubled, hurt, preoccupied or upset, often with no obvious cause to point to.

Inauthenticity and Transference

Passive-aggression as a habit of personal inauthenticity is socially irritating and anti-social to all but the most indifferent of people.  And for the aggressor it is a sure way to lose friends or partners, to ensure a lack of popularity (or conversely to become popular in groups whose currency is passive- or overt aggression) and to instill angry, sometimes even violent, responses in others.  In psychotherapy, passive-aggressive patients tend to express their anger in a variety of ways: time-keeping, last-minute or repeated cancellations, unwillingness to fully engage or disclose, attempts to shift responsibility, non-payment of sessions, repeated breaches of agreed boundaries and other destructive behaviours that defeat the therapeutic endeavour.

In the psychotherapy process itself, passive-aggression can manifest in the form of negative transference – relating to the therapist as if he or she were someone from the patient’s past for whom the original aggression was intended but never openly expressed.  Negative transference can result in negative counter-transference (the therapist’s offended reaction to the patient’s offensive transference).  In terms of passive-aggression, transference from the patient is effectively a type of prejudice that the patient holds, punishing others for the perceived misdeeds or failings of another.

Transference: the redirection of desires, expectations or emotions from a past situation or person to another (e.g. the psychotherapist)

As Prejudice

A patient who has had negative experiences of men, for example, could behave passive-aggressively towards her male therapist as if he were one of these men from her past, even though the therapist has done nothing to elicit such a response, other than being male.  Effectively, such behaviour is not dissimilar to a prejudice that targets another race, religion, gender or social group based, for example, on negative experiences of one or two individuals fitting such a profile and then extrapolated to apply to all instances of that identity.  The failure to express the emotions associated with the experience become the basis of a general prejudice against whole groups of innocent people sharing either outward resemblances or familiar associations of feelings in the passive-aggressive individual.  The task of the therapist is to be aware of transference – in this case the passive-aggression – and at the same time hold in his or her awareness any counter-transferential impulses rather than acting on them.  Otherwise, the end result is the therapist beginning to ‘act out’ the unexpressed feelings of the patient, thus confirming the patient’s existing prejudice.

An example of this type of passive-aggressive transference is the patient who arrives late to each session or cancels sessions with very little notice, or who continues to frustrate or inconvenience the therapy work in some way.  The same patient may mistrust or dislike the therapist with no evidence to support the mistrust or dislike.  He or she may also fail to bring the necessary motivation, energy or commitment to the therapeutic relationship, defeating any attempt on the therapist’s part to ‘help’ whilst at the same time behaving as if the therapist has failed to help through lack of skill, caring or insight.  If left unaddressed, the situation can result in the therapist feeling frustrated, angry or ineffective and the therapeutic endeavour being sabotaged.

Approaches in Psychotherapy

My approach to both negative transference and passive-aggression is always the same: open dialogue and my honest description of what I see happening.  Indeed, at the assessment stage it is usually apparent to me what transference issues may potentially emerge and, particularly in the case of negative transference potential, I would have an explicit discussion about the possibility arising and the steps that we can take to address it and work with it constructively.  This way the patient is made aware and is prepared for any instances that subsequently emerge in ways that maximise the chances of therapeutic success.  That said, habitually passive-aggressive people – through sheer force of habit – tend to find a wide variety of ways through which to leak hostile energy into the relationship.  Again, it is my experience that the combination of clearly defined boundaries and confronting each instance of such behaviour openly and honestly, inviting the patient to work with the underlying feelings in a constructive way, either brings about a shift into constructive therapeutic work, or the imminent end or abandonment of the therapy by a disgruntled patient.  Either case is better, in my view, than continuing to engage in an inauthentic, destructive, time-wasting and money-wasting process whereby the therapist becomes disempowered, disrespected and deflated, and where the patient only succeeds in reinforcing his or her destructive habits within a relationship that is designed to provide him or her with genuine care, insight and support.

For patients who know or suspect themselves to have passive-aggressive tendencies, it’s important that they come to therapy with an attitude of goodwill and openness about their habits, with a genuine desire to look at feelings they may have been holding onto for many years.  For many, passive-aggressive behaviour and the emotional energy that fuels it sits on the periphery of their awareness, and denial only helps maintain both the suppression or repression and the destructive behaviour itself.  Some patients are so entrenched in their passive-aggression that to have it challenged or explored feels like a threat to their sense of self, and in those cases many will terminate the therapy early on, or fail to meaningfully engage at all.  By definition, habitual suppression or repression of aggressive energy can often fuel depression, self-harm and self-starvation, substance misuse or addictions,  and other complicating secondary behaviours in the long run.

When dealing with passive-aggressive behaviour as a discreet problem, approaches in psychotherapy are quite straightforward and involve identifying suppressed emotions, and any unfinished business from which the emotions originate, developing skills in emotional awareness, personal responsibility, clarifying the functional importance of personal boundaries, and non-violent communication skills.  The overall project being one of helping the passive-aggressive individual become more authentic in his or her ways of relating to others.

Approaches in Social Settings

Dealing with passive-aggressive people on a social level can be a different matter.  Some suggest simply ignoring the behaviour, pretending that it has no effect, with the notion that the aggressor will stop when he or she senses that the victim is unaffected by his or her efforts.  This tact obviously requires a fair degree of restraint and tolerance of anti-social behaviour in the hope that it will end at some point.  My experience is that it doesn’t tend to work as a long-term solution, and the offending behaviour will simply return or be passed on to another victim.

Another solution can be to dis-engage, where possible, from passive-aggressive people altogether, refusing to allow them their toxic influence upon us.  The third option, as in the therapeutic example above, is non-violent confrontation of the aggressor with simple openness and honesty regarding the impact that the aggressor is having and a declaration of one’s personal boundaries and consequences around such behaviour.  ‘If you continue to do this, then the consequence will be this…’ etc.  With clear boundaries and consequences of boundary breaches spelled out, the hope is that the aggressor will see reason and desist now that the game is up and any backlash for him or her spelled out before it happens again.  Maintaining and acting on such boundaries consistently is essential for them to be meaningful.  Each approach is entirely dependant upon the particular circumstances and individual concerned.  But patients who are victims of passive-aggressive people in, for example, the workplace, can learn a variety of skills to deal with their particular circumstances effectively.

In the end, however, passive-aggression is at its core an unskilful means of expressing emotional energy covertly in destructive ways.  It causes unneccessary stress, hurt or misery for recipients, and by its nature is a source of primary and secondary misery in the passive-aggressive person: primary in the unpleasant inner world of passive-aggressive people, and secondary in the losses and negative, sometimes violent, repercussions they can suffer as a result of their behaviour.  It is a prime example of what happens when we fail – through learned helplessness, lack of social skills, personal immaturity or simple cowardice – to express our thoughts and feelings openly, honestly and authentically in relationship, instead meting out our pent-up hostilities as covert punishments upon the innocent.  As a social phenomenon of global proportions it is, I would suggest, a pandemic of cultural inauthenticity that – for the sake of a happier, more authentic society – we would all do well to address wherever and whenever it arises.

All written material on this website is subject to copyright and cannot be used or reproduced without permission and clear attribution being made to the author.  Please contact me if in doubt.

3 Comments Add yours

  1. Saba says:

    Great informative post. The post is clear, concise and comes from the depth of knowledge.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s